Redburn says Big Oil no longer a ‘buy’ as peak demand looms

Sector underestimates regulations aimed at curbing climate change argues research house

Redburn, the equity research house, has removed all “buy” ratings from the biggest integrated oil companies, arguing that the industry faces an “existential risk” as long-term forecasts for oil demand are up to 30 per cent too high.

Predictions for oil demand growth were still underestimating government action to tackle climate change, warned the research house, adding that the industry could eventually face even more draconian measures if consumption did not stop rising soon.

Redburn’s move, which amounts to a near sector-wide downgrade, is likely to hit sentiment in an industry already struggling to entice investors. The research house forecasts that oil demand could peak within five years.

“When industries face existential risk, historical multiples provide no floor for share prices,” said the report by analysts Peter Low and Stuart Joyner. “Rather, accelerating uncertainty means the sector’s cost of capital will rise further, perpetuating the derating.”

Redburn said it was hitting ExxonMobil — the biggest oil company by market capitalisation — with a rare “double downgrade”, bumping it from “buy” to “sell” in one move. It also downgraded Royal Dutch Shell and Repsol to “sell” while moving BP, Eni and Austria’s OMV down to “neutral”.

The report piles pressure on an industry that saw ExxonMobil fall out of the S&P 500 index’s top 10 at the end of August for the first time since the benchmark’s conception nearly 90 years ago.

The energy sector has slipped to less than 4.5 per cent of the S&P 500’s total market capitalisation, down from about 15 per cent a decade ago, as energy stocks have struggled while other sectors such as technology have grown.

Sceptics of Redburn’s bearish view argue that oil stocks are undervalued and that the commodity cycle will turn, pointing to continued growth in oil demand, particularly in emerging markets.

But Redburn said investors were right to be wary of the sector, arguing that oil demand will start declining by about 2 per cent per annum from the middle of the next decade.

The research house is more cautious towards the oil sector than peers, with most analysts not predicting a peak in crude demand until 2030 at the earliest.

Each year oil demand remains on its current trajectory the risk of greater future disruption increases

Redburn report

But Redburn argues that the impact of government regulation to meet climate targets was still being underestimated, as attempts to keep the global rise in temperatures below 2°C ramp up.

Redburn said that even if the sceptics were right and oil demand kept rising beyond 2025, the industry could be setting itself up for an even harder fall. Belated attempts to slow climate change were likely to be more extreme, Redburn argued, and could eventually hit oil demand harder.

“Each year oil demand remains on its current trajectory the risk of greater future disruption increases,” the report said.

The research house said it believed long-term forecasts for oil demand growth were at least 30 per cent too high, saying the International Energy Agency — widely used as a benchmark in the industry — and others were underestimating the speed of regulatory and technological shifts.

Mr Joyner, who contributed to the report, warned that energy groups were likely to face rising capital costs as a result of slowing demand, which would weigh on profits.

“Their exposure to an increasingly uncertain demand outlook is therefore rising,” the report said.

This article was written by  Harry Dempsey and David Sheppard for Financial Times To see the original version of this story, please click HERE.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *